A full day on the showroom floor of a volume-brand dealership. Every visit goes through reception; then a salesperson gives them information, X% of those informed negotiate with that salesperson, Y% of negotiations end in a deal, and the deal moves on to financing and paperwork, in a queue. Z, the dealership’s conversion, is sales over visits. The conventional dealership is compared with adding an in-car kiosk to every vehicle, Video Kiosks and QR, served by VCCaaS agents. A Video Kiosk is not self-service: there is a person on the other side, serving by video.
Could not copy automatically. The text is selected: copy it with ⌘C or Ctrl+C.
Each scenario is set separately. By default all three have the same staff: the kiosks and the VCCaaS add capacity without removing anyone. Try removing a salesperson in Scenarios 2 and 3 and look at the effect in “What changes in the dealership” and in “Economics · scenarios 1, 2 and 3”.
Same dealership, same day and same customers. “Utilization”: average across VCCaaS agents during opening hours.
Same day and same customers in all three scenarios. The dealership pays for in-person and remote service, the in-car kiosks, the Video Kiosks and the QR totems; it earns the margin plus the finance and insurance income on projected sales. The result is the difference.
They apply to all three scenarios; X and Y are set at the top, next to the vehicles on display. Moving a value recalculates the day and the animation continues from the same time. Values with a source have published backing; the rest are working assumptions: adjust them with the client’s data before showing any amount.
Out of scope: test drives, trade-in appraisal, after-sales and service, and phone or online sales without a visit.
Simulation model with working assumptions. It is meant for comparing scenarios with each other, not as a forecast. Interactive Powers · interactivepowers.com